What the company brain costs

Set your own conditions and the page recalculates. Everything that could be measured was measured by a run; everything else is honestly marked as an assumption you can change.

Your conditions

A month in money

—
per month, total
—
of that, meeting extraction
—
of that, employee questions
—
per employee per month
meeting extraction questions to memory

Memory after a year estimate throughout

We measured neither objects per meeting nor bytes per object — those are assumptions tied to conversation length. What is measured here is something else, and more important: the system counts its own volume and growth per organisation, and shows the slope rather than just the size.

—
objects in the graph
—
on disk
—
growth per month at peak

It is the growth slope, not the starting size, that bankrupts a long-lived memory — so the system measures volume and growth itself and reports them per organisation. Decay is typed: contextual links (mentioned near each other) weaken, while structural facts — decided, assigned — never decay.

What you get for that money

Only measured results below. Every row names the run it came from; arms marked invalid do not appear in this table.

what was comparedbaseline oursrun

Closed perimeter